Cancellation of package tours: Federal government sees responsibility in courts

| |

economy Package tours

The federal government is shifting clarification of the cancellation dispute to the courts

As of May 17, 2020 | Reading time: 3 minutes

Vacation or no vacation? The question concerns consumers who have already booked Vacation or no vacation? The question concerns consumers who have already booked

Vacation or no vacation? The question concerns consumers who have already booked

Credit: picture alliance / dpa

Make payment or cancel? Despite the foreseeable border openings, thousands of holidaymakers suffer from the unresolved legal situation. The federal government sees responsibility in the courts. The Greens fear a wave of lawsuits.

VMany countries plan to lift travel restrictions, but the uncertainty remains: Can I cancel my summer vacation booked free of charge and will I get my down payment back from the tour operator? Can I refuse the remaining payment for the package tour or will I lose everything?

The Federal Government has now made it clear that legal certainty cannot be expected from it: the courts would have to decide in individual cases.

At least that is what the Federal Government replied to a small question from the Bündnis90 / Die Grünen parliamentary group. According to the German Civil Code (BGB 651), consumers can only withdraw from the package free of charge if “unavoidable exceptional circumstances lead to considerable impairment” at the holiday location.

also read

The dream of a vacation flight has come a long way from the Corona crisis

Compensation for travelers

The question of whether such circumstances still exist due to Covid 19 dangers at the end of June, July or August cannot currently be answered generally, said the Parliamentary State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, Rita Hagl-Kehl: “This can only happen in each individual case. “

Whether a travel warning from the Federal Foreign Office still applied at the time of the planned trip was “an important indication” – but nothing more. The requirements for a free cancellation “may exist regardless of a travel warning from the Federal Foreign Office or may not exist despite such a travel warning”.

The Federal Government cannot create more legal certainty, the State Secretary explains: “An abstract, general rule” with regard to the right of withdrawal “is not considered by the Federal Government”. This would violate the European package travel directive.

also read

The Sellin pier is a pier on the Baltic Sea. The bridge is 394 meters long. It was opened in 1998, Sellin, Ruegen Island, Vorpommern-Ruegen District, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, Germany, Europe | The Sellin Pier is a pier at the Baltic Sea. The pier is 394 meters long. It was inaugurated in 1998, Sellin, Ruegen Island, County Vorpommern-Ruegen, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany, Europe | Use worldwide

The EU Commission, Hagl-Kehl informed the questioners, had confirmed “that the assessment of whether there are unavoidable exceptional circumstances must be made in each individual case”. The courts would have to decide: “The subsumption of the specific individual case under the legal characteristics is reserved for case law.”

This assessment by the Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection contradicts a legal opinion that was commissioned by the Federal Central Consumer Association (vzbv). WELT AM SONNTAG reported: According to the legal expert Klaus Tonner, “significant impairments” on summer vacation are so likely from today’s perspective that this results in a free cancellation right for all package travel bookings until the end of August.

Package holidaymakers need clarity

“There is complete chaos in the travel sector,” commented the consumer policy spokeswoman for Bündnis90 / Die Grünen, Tabea Rößner, the Federal Government’s response: consumers are “on the nerve end”. There is a massive increase in complaints at the consumer advice centers, but the federal government sees “incomprehensibly no need for action despite this huge mess”.

Since the official travel warning from the Federal Foreign Office expires on June 14, many consumers remain uncertain as to whether and how their package tour could still take place afterwards. With the “succinct answer” that each individual case has to be assessed individually, the Federal Government is proving to be a total failure in this question, Rößner criticizes: “In plain language, this means that the Federal Government is once again leaving consumers out in the cold.”

Consumers now have to make their own decision, says the green consumer rights expert. “Since there are no uniform regulations, I fear that the courts will subsequently be overwhelmed with lawsuits.”

also read

Holidays on balconies: If you have a balcony or garden, you can at least make yourself comfortable there during the Easter holidays

The EU has only made recommendations on this issue, Roessner notes. In the individual member states and also in the federal states, the situation continues to be extremely confusing. “Consumers can neither cancel carelessly nor withhold their payments for the time being – this is an unsustainable state,” said the Greens politician.

Your demand: “The federal government must create legal security and remedies here and not only have a one-sided view of the well-being of tourism companies.”

“If you don’t want to travel out of worry, you will have to pay cancellation fees”

A travel warning still applies within Europe due to the corona virus. The EU is discussing a voucher scheme for trips that have already been booked. Travel lawyer Kay Rodegra explains what this could look like and what rights vacationers have after this period.

Source: WELT / Daniela Will

.

Previous

Pending their possible reopening on June 2, Chartres restaurateurs offer take-out meals

Isabelle Adjani, Alexis Michalik, La Mouche … for a ceremony broadcast behind closed doors on June 23

Next

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.