archyworldys

LSG Lower Saxony-Bremen, 01/12/2017 – L 13 AS 326/16 B ER

Such a person cannot have any protective effects under residence law, which would have to be taken into account when interpreting the FreizügG/EU (as already: LSG Lower Saxony-Bremen, resolutions of January 15, 2016 – L 15 AS 226/15 B ER -, of October 5, 2016 – L 15 AS 215/16 B ER – and from January 12, 2017 – L 13 AS 326/16 B ER; LSG Rhineland-Palatinate…Judgment of December 19, 2017 – L 3 AS 280/16 – juris para. 40 ff.,50 [Revision anhängig beim BSG zum Az. B 14 AS 16/18 R]Resolution of August 11, 2016 – L 3 AS 376/16 B ER – Hessian LSG, Resolution of October 31, 2016 – L 7 AS 565/16 B ER – a. A.: BSG, judgment of December 3, 2015 – B 4 AS 43/15 R; LSG North Rhine-Westphalia, resolution of January 27, 2016 – L 19 AS 29/16 B ER – LSG Sachsen-Anhalt, resolutions of April 29, 2016 – L 4 AS 182/16 B ER – and of August 24, 2016 – L 2 AS 449/16 B ER – LSG Hamburg, decision of 27 May 2016 – L 4 AS 160/16 B ER – LSG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of 1 July 2016 – L 26 AS 1421/16 B ER – Saxon LSG , Resolution of October 21, 2016 – L 7 AS 973/16 B ER – Schleswig-Holsteinisches LSG, Resolution of February 17, 2017 – L 6 AS 11/17 B ER – all: juris).

Trending