They recovered from the coronavirus. Were they infected again?

Can people recovering from an attack with the new coronavirus become infected again and again?

The Japanese government reported this week that a woman in Osaka had tested positive for the coronavirus for the second time, weeks after recovering from the infection and being discharged from the hospital.

Combined with China’s reports of similar cases, the case in Japan has raised some awkward questions. Reinfections are common among people who have recovered from the coronaviruses that cause the common cold.

But those pathogens are very different from the new coronavirus, and experts said it is unlikely that they will be cases of people infected a second time.

“I do not say that reinfection cannot occur, it will never occur, but in that short time it is unlikely,” said Florian Krammer, a virologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.

Even the slightest infection should leave at least short-term immunity against the virus in the recovering patient, he said.

Most likely, “reinfected” patients still had low levels of the virus when they were discharged from the hospital, and the tests could not detect it.

Even if there were occasional cases of reinfection, they do not appear to be happening in numbers large enough to be a priority at this point in the outbreak.

  • Updated on February 26, 2020

    • What is a coronavirus?
      It is a novel virus named for the crown-shaped peaks that protrude from its surface. Coronavirus can infect both animals and people and can cause a variety of respiratory diseases, from the common cold to more dangerous conditions, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome or SARS.
    • How do I keep myself and others safe?
      Washing your hands frequently is the most important thing you can do, along with staying home when you are sick.
    • What happens if I am traveling?
      The C.D.C. He has warned older and at-risk travelers to avoid Japan, Italy and Iran. The agency has also advised against all non-essential trips to South Korea and China.
    • Where has the virus spread?
      The virus, which originated in Wuhan, China, has made more than 80,000 people sick in at least 33 countries, including Italy, Iran and South Korea.
    • How contagious is the virus?
      According to a preliminary investigation, it seems moderately infectious, similar to SARS, and is probably transmitted through sneezing, coughing and contaminated surfaces. Scientists have estimated that each infected person could infect between 1.5 and 3.5 people without effective containment measures.
    • Who is working to contain the virus?
      World Health Organization officials have been working with officials in China, where growth has slowed. But this week, when confirmed cases shot up on two continents, experts warned that the world was not ready for a major outbreak.

A report published Thursday in JAMA supports the idea that people can test positive for the virus long after they appear to have recovered.

In four medical professionals exposed to the virus in Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the epidemic, a test that detects viral genetic material remained positive between five and 13 days after they were asymptomatic.

However, this does not necessarily mean that they could still infect others.

The PCR diagnostic test is highly sensitive and can amplify genetic material even from a single viral molecule. As such, the test could simply collect fragments of the virus.

PCR tests can Detecting measles virus remains months after people who had the disease stopped transmitting the infectious virus, Dr. Krammer said.

The other possibility is that the negative test was performed poorly, or the samples were stored at a temperature at which the virus deteriorates. The throat swab can also ignore the virus that hides in other parts of the body.

“A virus test is positive if the virus was present in the swab in sufficient quantities at the time the sample was taken,” said Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

“A negative test is not definitive to know that there is no more virus in that person.”

Dr. Lipsitch offered an analogy: a jar of moldy jam on top. Scraping the surface can give the impression that the jam now has no mold, but in fact the jar may still contain mold that continues to grow.

The Japanese woman initially had mild symptoms of coronavirus infection and tested positive at the end of January. She was discharged from the hospital on February 1. She tested positive again on Wednesday after coming from a sore throat and chest pain.

But this finding is not surprising or reassuring, said Dr. Stanley Perlman, a coronavirus expert at the University of Iowa. “The problem is whether you will see it in seven months or a year,” he said. “That’s what matters to you.”

The new coronavirus closely resembles those that cause SARS and, to a lesser extent, MERS. There are no reports of reinfections with the SARS virus, said Dr. Perlman, and only one who has heard of a patient in recovery from MERS.

Dr. Perlman’s research with MERS has shown that the strength of the immune response depends on the severity of the infection, but that even in those with severe disease, which should produce the strongest immune responses, immunity seemed wane within a year.

The duration of immunity will also be a key question to solve when designing a vaccine for the new coronavirus, particularly if the virus becomes a seasonal threat such as influenza.

“What is the nature of immunity to this virus after infection?” Dr. Lipsitch said. “That is a research question that is urgent.”


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

On Key

Related Posts