California rejected Gov. Gavin Newsom as a political threat.
“The Trump administration would prefer to achieve its base to score free political points and to give millions access than their right. California will continue to defend women’s right to make a choice, and we don’t go back. T from the protection of reproductive freedom to all – full stop. ”
The Attorney General said Xavier Becerra California on Twitter California cost the law.
“The President & Vice-President is once again attacking women’s health in order to make a stand on today’s counter-choice,” wrote Becerra. He said: “While it is regrettable that the President’s moral compass always pays attention to a division adding to a free political gain, California will not be prevented.”
It requires a state, including California, to cover private health plans for abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights think tank, and 11 states have laws restricting abortion coverage in private health plans, including those offered on the Affordable Care Acts a single insurance market.
In Friday’s conference call with reporters, Roger Severino, director of the Office of Civil Rights, Health and Human Services, cited Weldon reform, which is regularly added to HHS appropriation bills, as the legal basis for the administration’s argument that California is in violation of the law. federal.
The amendment states that no such funds may be made available to a federal agency or program, or to a state government or to local government, if any agency acts, a register, or government acts on the basis of any reason that the t healthcare abortion available, it does not pay for, provides cover or provides it. ”
Newsom advocates said it was referring to 2016 Obama’s administrative decision that had found that California’s abortion coverage requirements did not exceed the Weldon reform relating to abortion passing Congress – the same amendment that the Trump administration Friday cited as a legal basis for a threat to federal funds t to draw.
Severino also said that HHS accepted this action after receiving complaints from two California groups: Guadalupanas Missionary of the Holy Spirit and Wesleyan Skyline Church.
He refused to identify what the specific funding stream could be drawn by the administration of the Trump. “There is a process, if we are not coming, it could revoke federal funding streams,” he said. “California is a major consumer of HHS funds. We are giving them 30 days so we don’t have to cross that bridge. ”
Antiabortion groups announced the announcement and work of administration on the social conservative agenda.
“President Trump has ruled as the most pro-life president in history,” said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-offense group Susan B. Anthony List. “Abortion is not healthcare and no Americans should be obliged to participate in the destruction of innocent human life.” T
A recent poll from Kaiser Family Foundation found that 59 per cent of Americans believe that abortion should be legal in most cases, while about 7 out of 10 said that Roe v. Wade they should not be canceled. Seventy-nine per cent believe that it is better for women to make the decision in consultation with their doctors, rather than with law-makers.
Most Americans support laws which require women to stay 24 hours between a healthcare provider meeting and obtain abortion and laws that require doctors to display and describe ultrasound images.
“While Trump stands with the small number of Americans who want politicians to be interfering with their personal health decisions, we will uphold almost 80% of Americans who support abortion access,” Alexis McGill Johnson, Acting President and CEO Planned Parenthood said the Action Fund in a statement. “We will never stop fighting for all the people in this country who need access to sexual and reproductive health care, including abortion.” T
However, some of its conservative social agenda has been seen in the courts. A federal judge annulled an HHS “rule of conscience” which would enable healthcare providers to refuse to comply with certain procedures, such as abortion or sterilization, based on religious or moral objections. The administration is appealing against that decision.