The Peril of Earthly Settings in Science Fiction and Fantasy
A growing concern among genre enthusiasts is the trend of grounding fantastical narratives in familiar, terrestrial locations. This approach, while seemingly aiming for relatability, often undermines the very essence of imaginative world-building that defines science fiction and fantasy. The latest iteration of the He-Man franchise is facing scrutiny for potentially falling into this trap, sparking a debate about the importance of maintaining a sense of cosmic scale and otherworldly wonder.
The Allure of the Unknown: Why Space is the Place
There’s an unspoken agreement within the realms of science fiction and fantasy: the most compelling stories unfold far from home. Confining narratives to our solar system, or worse, Earth itself, frequently diminishes the sense of awe and possibility that these genres promise. The vastness of space, the potential for truly alien civilizations, and the freedom to create entirely new rules of physics are all sacrificed when stories are tethered to the mundane realities of our planet.
Consider the success of franchises like Star Wars and Dune. Their power lies, in part, in their complete detachment from Earthly concerns. They present fully realized universes with unique histories, cultures, and ecologies. This immersive quality is difficult to achieve when characters are popping into California shopping malls, as happened in the 1987 film adaptation of Masters of the Universe. The jarring juxtaposition of He-Man, a figure of cosmic power, with the banality of everyday life felt profoundly wrong to many fans.
Alien: Earth stands as a notable exception to this rule. The film cleverly subverts expectations by portraying humanity as the more dangerous species, reframing the xenomorphs as relatively harmless in comparison. This intelligent approach demonstrates that Earthly settings can work, but only when they serve a specific narrative purpose and actively challenge genre conventions.
Lessons from Past Mistakes
The history of science fiction and fantasy is littered with examples of franchises that stumbled when they brought the action home. Galactica 1980, a spin-off of the beloved Battlestar Galactica, suffered from a significant drop in quality when it shifted its focus to Earth. The original series thrived on its sense of desperate flight and the struggle for survival in a hostile universe. Grounding the story on Earth stripped away that tension and ultimately led to its cancellation after just one season.
Similarly, later seasons of Lexx, a once-groundbreaking space opera, lost much of their charm when they began to feature Earth-based storylines. The show’s strength lay in its bizarre and unpredictable exploration of the cosmos. By anchoring the narrative to our solar system, the creators inadvertently limited its scope and diminished its sense of wonder.
What do audiences truly seek from these genres? Is it a reflection of our own world, or an escape into something entirely different? The answer, for most, lies firmly in the latter. The power of science fiction and fantasy lies in their ability to transport us to realms beyond our wildest imaginations, and that power is diminished when those realms are reduced to familiar landscapes.
External resources offer further insight into the importance of world-building in speculative fiction. Tor.com’s guide to worldbuilding provides a comprehensive overview of the techniques used to create immersive and believable fictional universes. Additionally, Smithsonian Magazine’s exploration of the science behind science fiction highlights the genre’s ability to inspire scientific innovation and explore complex philosophical questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Why is setting science fiction on Earth often considered a mistake?
Setting science fiction on Earth can diminish the sense of wonder and escapism that the genre offers. The vastness of space and the potential for truly alien worlds are often sacrificed for the sake of relatability.
-
Are there any exceptions to the rule of avoiding Earthly settings?
Alien: Earth is often cited as a successful example of a science fiction story set on Earth. However, it cleverly subverts expectations by portraying humanity as the more dangerous species.
-
How did Galactica 1980 suffer from its Earth-based setting?
Galactica 1980 lost the tension and sense of desperation that defined the original Battlestar Galactica series when it shifted its focus to Earth, ultimately leading to its cancellation.
-
What is the importance of world-building in science fiction and fantasy?
World-building is crucial for creating immersive and believable fictional universes. It allows authors to explore complex themes and ideas in a unique and engaging way.
-
Does grounding a fantasy story in reality always detract from its appeal?
Not necessarily, but it requires careful execution. The contrast between the fantastical and the mundane must be purposeful and serve the narrative, rather than feeling jarring or incongruous.
What are your thoughts on the trend of grounding science fiction and fantasy in reality? Do you prefer stories that take place in entirely new universes, or do you appreciate when familiar settings are incorporated? Share your opinions in the comments below!
Share this article with fellow fans and let’s continue the conversation!
Discover more from Archyworldys
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.