The Unseen Architects of Racial Equality: 60 Years After ICERD, the Global South Leads the Fight
Sixty years ago, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), a landmark treaty intended to dismantle the structures of prejudice and inequality worldwide. But the conventional narrative – that Western nations bestowed human rights upon the world – obscures a crucial truth: the very foundation of this vital legal framework was largely built by the nations of the Global South, born from the urgency of newly independent states confronting the realities of systemic racism.
From Colonial Rule to Global Convention
In 1963, as the wave of decolonization swept across Africa and Asia, nine newly independent African nations recognized a critical gap in international law. They jointly presented a resolution to the UNGA, calling for the creation of a treaty specifically addressing racial discrimination. Senegal’s representative eloquently articulated the need: “Racial discrimination was still the rule in African colonial territories and in South Africa, and was not unknown in other parts of the world… The time had come to bring all States into that struggle.” This wasn’t merely a plea for justice; it was a demand for recognition of a universal human right, one that had been systematically denied for centuries.
Two years later, the ICERD was unanimously adopted, a testament to the power of collective action and a rejection of the pseudoscientific justifications for racial superiority. The convention unequivocally declared doctrines of racial differentiation “scientifically false, morally condemnable and socially unjust.” It represented a bold step towards a world free from the scourge of racism, yet the fight for true equality remains far from over.
A World Still Marked by Discrimination
Today, six decades after its adoption, millions globally continue to experience racial discrimination in its myriad forms – from biased policing and restrictive immigration policies to exploitative labor practices. The promise of ICERD remains unfulfilled, and in some regions, the forces of racism are actively resurgent.
Recent reports paint a stark picture. In Brazil, a deadly police operation in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas this October, documented by Amnesty International, resulted in the massacre of over 100 people, disproportionately impacting Afro-Brazilians living in poverty. This tragic event underscores the systemic violence faced by marginalized communities.
In Tunisia, authorities have engaged in racially targeted arrests, detentions, and mass expulsions of Black refugees and asylum seekers over the past three years. Amnesty International’s documentation reveals a disturbing pattern of discrimination within migration policies.
Meanwhile, in Saudi Arabia, Kenyan female domestic workers endure racism and exploitation, facing grueling and abusive working conditions. These abuses highlight the vulnerability of migrant workers and the need for stronger protections.
Even in nations with long-standing commitments to equality, progress is fragile. In the United States, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have been dismantled across federal agencies. This rollback threatens to undermine decades of work to address systemic racism. Furthermore, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids targeting migrants and refugees, rooted in white supremacist narratives, continue to inflict trauma and fear. Investigations reveal horrific conditions within detention centers, including torture and deliberate neglect.
The rise of digital technologies presents new challenges. Amnesty International has documented how these technologies can automate and entrench racism, while social media platforms often fail to adequately moderate racist and xenophobic content. For instance, an investigation into the United Kingdom’s Southport racist riots revealed that X’s design and policies fostered an environment conducive to inflammatory narratives and violence against Muslims and migrants.
Even human rights defenders from the Global South face discrimination when seeking visas to attend crucial meetings in the Global North, hindering their ability to participate in shaping international human rights policy. This systemic barrier undermines the very principles of inclusivity and participation that ICERD seeks to uphold.
The Echoes of Colonialism
These contemporary instances of systemic racism are inextricably linked to the enduring legacies of European colonialism and the racist ideologies that underpinned it. This era, spanning centuries and continents, inflicted immeasurable harm – from the erasure of Indigenous populations to the horrors of the transatlantic slave trade. The scars of colonialism continue to shape power dynamics and perpetuate inequalities today.
The resurgence of far-right movements globally has fueled a dangerous rise in racist and xenophobic rhetoric, scapegoating migrants and refugees, and eroding anti-discrimination measures. At the same time, some Western states have been willing to dismantle international law and institutions to legitimize actions that violate fundamental human rights principles.
Did You Know?: The ICERD was the third major human rights treaty adopted by the UN, following the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
The ongoing situation in Gaza serves as a stark example. Western states have faced criticism for failing to hold Israel accountable for actions that Amnesty International has concluded amount to genocide against Palestinians. This inaction raises serious questions about the commitment to universal human rights.
The Pursuit of Justice and Reparations
Just as the creation of ICERD was spearheaded by African states six decades ago, nations of the Global South continue to lead the fight against racial oppression. South Africa notably brought the case against Israel before the International Court of Justice and co-founded The Hague Group, a coalition of eight Global South states dedicated to holding Israel accountable for genocide. This courageous action demonstrates a commitment to international justice.
The call for reparations for colonialism and slavery is gaining momentum, led by Caribbean and African states, alongside Indigenous peoples and people of African descent. The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) is intensifying pressure on European governments to confront their colonial past, as evidenced by a recent visit to the United Kingdom by the CARICOM Reparations Commission. This diplomatic effort seeks to address the long-term consequences of historical injustices.
The African Union’s declaration of 2026-36 as the Decade of Reparations and the International Conference on the Crimes of Colonialism in Algiers signal a growing determination to codify colonialism as a crime under international law. This represents a significant step towards achieving accountability and redress.
Pro Tip: Understanding the historical context of racial discrimination is crucial for dismantling systemic inequalities. Explore resources from organizations like the United Nations Human Rights Office (https://www.ohchr.org/) to deepen your knowledge.
But systemic change requires more than just governmental action. Across the world, grassroots movements are resisting racism and demanding justice. In Brazil, hundreds of thousands of Afro-Brazilian women participated in the March of Black Women for Reparations and Wellbeing, protesting against racist and gendered violence. In the United States, communities mobilized to protect migrant communities and businesses against ICE raids.
Governments must listen to their people and fulfill their obligations under ICERD and national law to protect marginalized communities from discrimination. The fight for racial equality is a collective responsibility, and it demands unwavering commitment from all stakeholders.
What role can individuals play in challenging systemic racism in their own communities? How can we ensure that the principles of ICERD are translated into concrete action and lasting change?
Frequently Asked Questions About Racial Discrimination and ICERD
-
What is the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)?
ICERD is a UN treaty adopted in 1965 that commits its parties to eliminate all forms of racial discrimination and promote understanding between all races.
-
Why was the ICERD primarily driven by nations of the Global South?
Newly independent African states recognized the urgent need for an international legal framework to address racial discrimination, which was prevalent in their own countries and globally.
-
What are some current examples of racial discrimination highlighted in the article?
The article details instances of discrimination in Brazil, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the United Kingdom, ranging from police brutality to exploitative labor practices and discriminatory immigration policies.
-
How does the legacy of colonialism contribute to contemporary racism?
Colonialism established racist ideologies and power structures that continue to shape inequalities today, perpetuating systemic discrimination against marginalized communities.
-
What is the role of reparations in addressing historical injustices?
Reparations are seen as a crucial step towards acknowledging the harm caused by colonialism and slavery and providing redress to affected communities.
Share this article to amplify the conversation and join the movement for racial justice. Let’s work together to build a world where equality and dignity are a reality for all.
Discover more from Archyworldys
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
