Sacramento Surveillance Program Shut Down: Victory!

0 comments

California Court Halts Mass Surveillance Program Using Smart Meter Data

A landmark ruling in California has brought an end to a decade-long program of warrantless surveillance, where law enforcement agencies secretly monitored the electricity usage of hundreds of thousands of residents. The Sacramento County Superior Court determined that the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and local police violated state privacy laws by collecting and sharing granular smart meter data in a broad search for potential cannabis cultivation.

The case, brought by the Asian American Liberation Network, Khurshid Khoja, and Alfonso Nguyen, highlighted the significant privacy risks inherent in the widespread deployment of smart meter technology. Plaintiffs argued that the program fostered a climate of suspicion, potentially leading to unwarranted police encounters and disproportionately impacting Asian communities. The court agreed that the data collection practices went beyond legitimate law enforcement investigation.

The Erosion of Privacy in the Age of Smart Technology

Smart meters, designed to improve energy efficiency and grid management, have quietly become powerful surveillance tools. These devices record electricity consumption in short intervals – often every hour or even more frequently – creating a detailed profile of life within a home. This data can reveal not only when residents are present, but also patterns of activity suggesting the use of specific appliances, potentially indicating routines and habits.

The SMUD case underscores a growing concern: the potential for utilities to become de facto extensions of law enforcement, circumventing traditional safeguards like warrants and probable cause. The court specifically noted that the program wasn’t a targeted investigation into specific crimes, but rather a “dragnet” that treated all 650,000 SMUD customers as potential suspects. This practice, the court found, violated SMUD’s legal obligations to protect customer confidentiality.

“The process of making regular requests for all customer information…in the hopes of identifying evidence…without any report or other evidence to suggest that such a crime may have occurred, is not an ongoing investigation,” the court stated in its ruling. SMUD provided police with over 33,000 “tips” based on perceived high electricity usage, effectively outsourcing preliminary investigative work to the utility.

This raises a critical question: where do we draw the line between legitimate law enforcement needs and the fundamental right to privacy within our homes? The increasing interconnectedness of our lives through smart devices demands a robust legal framework to protect against the misuse of personal data.

While the court rejected a claim that the program violated the California Constitution’s search and seizure clause, the ruling still represents a significant victory for privacy advocates. It establishes a clear precedent that utilities cannot freely disclose customer data to law enforcement without a reasonable basis for suspicion.

The implications extend beyond California. Similar smart meter programs exist across the country, raising concerns about the potential for widespread surveillance. This case serves as a warning to utilities nationwide: customer data is not a free resource for law enforcement, and privacy protections must be prioritized.

The legal team, led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Monty Agarwal of Vallejo, Antolin, Agarwal, Kanter LLP, successfully argued that the program created substantial harms, including the potential for false accusations and discriminatory targeting.

Did You Know? Granular smart meter data can reveal surprisingly intimate details about your life, including when you typically sleep, shower, or are away from home.

What further safeguards are needed to protect privacy in the age of smart technology? And how can we ensure that law enforcement utilizes these tools responsibly and ethically?

For more information on the case, see the court order: https://www.eff.org/document/aaln-v-smud-order-writ-mandate. Learn more about the case and the EFF’s work: https://www.eff.org/cases/asian-american-liberation-network-v-smud-et-al and https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/07/when-your-power-meter-becomes-tool-mass-surveillance.

Additional resources on smart meter privacy can be found at the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy.

Frequently Asked Questions About Smart Meter Surveillance

What is smart meter surveillance?

Smart meter surveillance involves law enforcement accessing and analyzing detailed electricity usage data collected by smart meters to identify potential criminal activity, often without a warrant.

Why is smart meter data considered private?

Smart meter data reveals intimate details about your life inside your home, including your daily routines, appliance usage, and when you are present or absent.

What was the outcome of the SMUD case?

The Sacramento County Superior Court ruled that SMUD’s program of sharing granular smart meter data with law enforcement violated state privacy laws.

Can utilities legally share my smart meter data with police?

The SMUD case established that utilities cannot disclose customer data to law enforcement without a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.

What are the broader implications of this ruling?

This ruling sets a precedent for protecting privacy in the age of smart technology and may impact similar programs across the country.

How can I learn more about protecting my privacy with smart meters?

Resources from the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy offer guidance on understanding and managing your smart meter data.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and should not be considered legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney for advice on specific legal matters.

Share this article to raise awareness about the importance of protecting your privacy in the digital age. Join the conversation in the comments below – what are your thoughts on smart meter surveillance?



Discover more from Archyworldys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

You may also like