Details of the Lawsuit: Negligence and Improper Treatment

The lawsuit, filed on October 31, alleges that Dr. Harris failed to adequately assess Morton’s skin condition before performing the chemical peel. Specifically, the complaint states that Morton has a pre-existing condition, Tinea Versicolor, a common fungal skin infection, which should have precluded her from receiving the treatment. Instead of referring Morton to a dermatologist, Dr. Harris proceeded with the peel.

Furthermore, the suit contends that even without the presence of Tinea Versicolor, the chemical peel administered was unsuitable for Morton’s skin type. The complaint details that the peel, applied in two passes, was “completely inappropriate” for African American skin, particularly without prior preparation or pigment correction. This lack of preparation, according to the lawsuit, significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions.

The legal filing also points to the actions of a third-party defendant, alleging they used a chemical peel solution that was excessively strong on Morton’s back and arms, and did so without the direct supervision of Dr. Harris. Morton asserts that this resulted in second-degree burns, blistering, and permanent scarring.

Pain and Dismissal of Concerns

During the procedure, Morton reportedly experienced excruciating pain, crying out and vocalizing her discomfort. The lawsuit claims that her screams were so loud they prompted Dr. Harris to enter the treatment room for the first time that day. Despite Morton’s expressed pain, the suit alleges that Dr. Harris dismissed her concerns, reportedly telling her she was “being dramatic.”

The complaint further states that Dr. Harris only applied an “unknown solution from a spray bottle” to Morton’s back after witnessing her tears. Morton maintains that Dr. Harris never properly consulted with her, examined her skin, or approved a treatment plan before initiating the chemical peel.

Morton is seeking unspecified damages to cover medical expenses, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. Her attorney, Darren M. Tobin, stated, “What happened to Shamea when she was burned is unacceptable and inexcusable. We intend on pursuing full justice allowed under the law.”

This case raises important questions about the standards of care in cosmetic procedures and the potential for harm when treatments are not properly tailored to individual skin types and conditions. Do you think cosmetic procedures should be more heavily regulated? And what responsibility do patients have to thoroughly research their providers before undergoing treatment?

The American Society of Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) offers valuable resources for patients considering cosmetic procedures, including a directory of qualified dermatologic surgeons and information on procedure safety and recovery. Understanding the risks and benefits is crucial before making any decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions About Chemical Peels and Medical Malpractice