California Investigates TikTok: Censoring Trump Content?

0 comments

California Investigates TikTok Over Alleged Censorship of Political Content

California Governor Gavin Newsom has launched a review into TikTok’s content moderation practices, following user reports of suppressed posts critical of former President Trump and concerning information regarding federal law enforcement actions. The investigation centers on potential violations of state law designed to promote transparency from social media giants.


Newsom Orders TikTok Investigation Amid Censorship Claims

Governor Gavin Newsom announced Monday that California will investigate whether TikTok violated state law by suppressing content deemed critical of the Trump administration. The move comes after numerous TikTok users reported their videos concerning Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and references to the “Epstein” case received zero views, sparking accusations of political censorship.

Newsom shared a post from a user on X (formerly Twitter) demonstrating that typing “Epstein” resulted in a message indicating the term violated TikTok’s Community Guidelines. While TikTok attributed the issue to a recent power outage, skepticism remains.

“It’s time to investigate,” Newsom stated on X. “I am launching a review into whether TikTok is violating state law by censoring Trump-critical content.”

TikTok’s Content Moderation and California’s AB 587

The investigation will focus on whether TikTok is complying with California Assembly Bill (AB) 587, signed into law in 2022. This legislation mandates greater transparency from large social media companies regarding their content moderation policies and practices. Specifically, AB 587 requires platforms to publicly disclose the criteria used to remove or suppress content, as well as provide users with clear explanations for any moderation actions taken against their posts.

TikTok maintains it is not censoring content, attributing the reported issues to a temporary technical outage. “We’ve been working to restore our services following a power outage,” the company stated on X. “We are sorry for this disruption and hope to resolve it soon.” However, the timing of these reports coincides with a period of heightened scrutiny surrounding TikTok’s ownership and data privacy practices.

Recent changes to TikTok’s U.S. business structure, involving a sale to a group of American investors including Oracle, headed by Larry Ellison, a prominent Trump ally, have further fueled concerns about potential political influence. This sale has not quelled anxieties about the platform’s ties to China and the potential for data access by the Chinese government. What to know about the deal to keep TikTok in U.S.

Beyond political censorship, user concerns extend to TikTok’s updated privacy policy. Some users are deleting the app in protest, citing the expanded collection of personal data, including precise location information and increased interaction with AI tools. Tech consumer advocate Sean SVV expressed particular concern for immigrant communities, highlighting the potential for misuse of collected data. “They absolutely are valid to be concerned about, like what type of data they’re collecting, how they can use it, and which business partners they can share it with,” he said.

However, NBC News legal analyst Angela Cenedella suggests some of the alarm may be overstated. She notes that the data collection practices outlined in the updated policy are likely already in place and may be necessary for the platform’s algorithm to function effectively. “It appears there are collecting things like immigration status and racial and ethnic status,” she said. “They have likely always been doing this. This disclosure is something required to even have their algorithm.”

The debate over TikTok’s content moderation and data privacy practices underscores the broader challenges of regulating social media platforms in the digital age. How can governments balance the need to protect free speech and user privacy with the imperative to prevent the spread of misinformation and ensure fair competition?

Did You Know?:

Did You Know? AB 587 requires social media companies to publish regular reports detailing their content moderation efforts, including the number of posts removed or suppressed and the reasons for those actions.

The situation also raises questions about the role of algorithms in shaping public discourse. To what extent are social media algorithms amplifying certain viewpoints while suppressing others, and what safeguards are needed to ensure algorithmic transparency and accountability?

For more on the challenges of social media addiction, see Social media addiction’s surprising challenger? Anti-doomscrolling influencers.

Frequently Asked Questions About TikTok and Censorship

What is AB 587 and how does it relate to the TikTok investigation?

AB 587 is a California law requiring large social media companies to be more transparent about their content moderation practices. Governor Newsom’s investigation will determine if TikTok is complying with this law by adequately disclosing its content removal and suppression policies.

Why are TikTok users claiming their content is being censored?

Users report that posts related to ICE and the “Epstein” case are receiving zero views, leading them to believe TikTok is deliberately suppressing content critical of the Trump administration. TikTok attributes this to a technical outage.

What data is TikTok collecting with its updated privacy policy?

TikTok’s updated privacy policy allows for the collection of more detailed information, including precise location data, expanded interaction with AI tools, and broader use of personal data across advertising partners.

Is TikTok’s data collection inherently problematic?

While some data collection is necessary for the platform’s functionality, concerns exist about the potential for misuse of personal information, particularly for vulnerable communities like immigrant populations.

What is the connection between TikTok’s sale to Oracle and these censorship concerns?

The sale to a group of American investors, including Larry Ellison of Oracle, a Trump ally, has raised questions about potential political influence over TikTok’s content moderation policies.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Share this article with your network to spark a conversation! What are your thoughts on TikTok’s content moderation practices? Leave a comment below.

Disclaimer: This article provides information for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.



Discover more from Archyworldys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

You may also like