Victoria Police Launch Katy Perry Sexual Assault Investigation Following Ruby Rose Allegations

MELBOURNE, Australia — Pop sensation Katy Perry is now the subject of a formal criminal investigation by Victoria Police following grave sexual assault allegations leveled against her by Australian actress Ruby Rose.

The 40-year-old star of Orange Is the New Black claims the pop star assaulted her while she was in her twenties. Specifically, in a post that has since been removed, Rose accused the now 41-year-old Perry of “rubbing her vagina on [Rose’s] face.”

Legal Battle and Categorical Denials

The legal wheels began to turn on April 13, 2026, when Rose officially filed a police report. In response, Perry’s legal team has fired back with a scathing denial.

A representative for the singer told media outlets that the claims circulating on social media are “not only categorically false, they are dangerous reckless lies.” The statement further alleged that Rose has a “well-documented history” of leveling serious public accusations against various individuals, all of which have been denied.

Insiders close to the singer told The Sun that Perry was blindsided by the claims. Sources suggest the two women share a “complicated backstory” and were never close friends, describing the development as a “massive shock.”

Does the public’s perception of a celebrity’s “brand” unfairly influence how we view these conflicting narratives? Or should a formal police investigation be the only metric for truth?

The Catalyst: From Coachella to Courtroom

The public unraveling began unexpectedly on Instagram. The conflict was sparked by a critique of Justin Bieber’s recent Coachella performance, where the singer was criticized for streaming YouTube videos of himself during the set.

After Perry commented on the performance, Rose replied sharply: “Katy Perry assaulted me at spice market nightclub in Melbourne. Who gives a s**t what she thinks.”

Rose later expanded on the allegations via Threads, explaining her long silence. She claimed that Perry had assisted her in obtaining a U.S. visa in the 2010s by writing letters of recommendation, creating a dynamic that forced her to keep the incident a secret.

“I told the story publicly but changed it to be a ‘funny little drunk story’ because I didn’t know how else to handle it,” Rose wrote. “It has taken almost 2 decades to say this publicly.”

Rose has since announced a hiatus from public commentary, stating that she has finalized her reports and must remain silent while the Australian authorities conduct their work. She described the police request for silence as “quite a relief,” allowing her to begin a “healing process.”

Could the promise of professional advancement, such as visa assistance, act as a systemic silencer for victims in the entertainment industry?

<p>According to advocacy groups like <a href="https://www.rainn.org/">RAINN</a>, the time it takes for a victim to report an assault can be influenced by several factors, including fear of retaliation, shame, or a perceived power imbalance between the victim and the accused.</p>

<p>In the realm of global superstardom, this power imbalance is magnified. When an accused party possesses the influence to impact a victim's legal status—such as through visa recommendations—the barrier to reporting becomes nearly insurmountable for many.</p>

<p>Legally, "historical" does not mean "unprosecutable." Many jurisdictions, including those in Australia, have evolved their statutes of limitations to ensure that survivors of sexual violence have a pathway to justice, regardless of when the crime occurred.</p>

Disclaimer: This article reports on ongoing legal investigations. All parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Join the Conversation: Do you believe the legal system is doing enough to support survivors of historical assault? Share your thoughts in the comments below and share this article to keep the discussion going.

For more celebrity news or to submit a tip, visit Metro.co.uk or their Submit Stuff page.