Cezanne’s late work, as showcased in the Fondation Beyeler exhibition, isn’t just a retrospective; it’s a masterclass in how an artist can dismantle representation and rebuild it on entirely new terms. This isn’t simply about pretty landscapes or still lifes – it’s about the birth pangs of modern art, a moment where painting began to question *what it was* rather than simply *what it showed*. And the reverberations of that questioning are still felt today in every gallery showcasing abstract expressionism.
- The exhibition highlights Cezanne’s radical use of “taches” – touches of paint – prioritizing construction over imitation.
- His influence began with his 1895 exhibition, initially met with confusion but ultimately described as feeling like “being punched in the stomach.”
- The show demonstrates how Cezanne liberated color and form, paving the way for abstract expressionism.
The story of Ambroise Vollard’s initial bewilderment with “Rocks and Branches at Bibémus” – rotating the canvas repeatedly to find the “right” way up – is telling. It speaks to a fundamental shift in artistic intention. Cezanne wasn’t aiming for a faithful reproduction of nature; he was exploring the underlying structure, the *idea* of a landscape. This wasn’t a failure of representation, but a deliberate transcendence of it. It’s a fascinating parallel to the struggles contemporary artists face when pushing boundaries – the initial resistance, the questioning of value, and the eventual recognition of a new paradigm.
The exhibition’s curation, displaying the landscapes alongside the still lifes and figure paintings, underscores the universality of Cezanne’s vision. Whether depicting apples, bathers, or Mont St. Victoire, he approached each subject with the same rigorous exploration of form and color. The inclusion of the watercolor of “Mont St Victoire” is particularly astute, demonstrating how Cezanne’s experimentation with different mediums informed his broader artistic project.
Cezanne’s willingness to break rules – the elongated arm in “Boy in a Red Vest,” for example – isn’t simply artistic license; it’s a statement about the primacy of sensation and structure. As Liebermann pointed out, the distortion isn’t a flaw, but a necessary element of the painting’s overall harmony. This is a lesson for any artist navigating the tension between realism and expression. The enduring power of Cezanne’s work lies not just in its beauty, but in its intellectual rigor and its profound impact on the course of art history. It’s a reminder that true innovation often requires a willingness to challenge conventions and embrace the unexpected.
Worth a look
Discover more from Archyworldys
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.