U.S. military forces launched a second wave of strikes against Iranian targets on July 15, 2026, as President Donald Trump refused to rule out the seizure of Iranian islands. The escalation follows threats to target Iranian power plants and infrastructure if Tehran does not engage in diplomatic negotiations.
Escalating Military Operations Near the Strait of Hormuz
The U.S. military conducted two distinct waves of strikes on Wednesday, July 15, targeting Iranian coastal defense systems and cruise missile storage sites. According to CNBC, the U.S. Central Command confirmed the second wave of operations occurred at 3 p.m. ET, following an earlier round of attacks that concluded at 7:30 a.m. ET. These strikes specifically targeted Greater Tunb Island, a location deemed critical to the security of commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

President Trump has signaled that the intensity of these operations is likely to increase. In a series of statements, the president outlined a timeline for further strikes, specifically mentioning the potential targeting of critical infrastructure. Next week it gets really bad for them because next week comes the power plants,
Trump said. We’re going to knock out all their power plants. We’re going to knock out all their bridges unless they get to the table and negotiate.
The Strategic Debate Over Occupying Iranian Islands
Recent U.S. strikes have extended to islands including Qeshm, Kish, and Abu Musa, prompting renewed speculation regarding whether the U.S. intends to establish a permanent presence on Iranian territory. As Aljazeera, the prospect of a ground operation was previously discussed in March regarding Kharg Island, which handles roughly 90 percent of Iran’s crude oil exports. While talk of such seizures had subsided following a June 17 memorandum of understanding, the option appears to have returned to the forefront of U.S. military planning.
Diplomatic Posturing and Market Uncertainty
Despite the intensifying military campaign, both sides continue to reference the possibility of a diplomatic resolution. President Trump claimed on Wednesday that he received word Iran is interested in meeting. They’re nasty people, but they want to make a deal,
he stated during a Fox Business interview. Simultaneously, Iranian officials are maintaining a combat-ready stance while leaving the door open for talks. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker, stated that while the nation must be prepared for battle, it must also use the tools of diplomacy and negotiation to achieve and solidify our national interests.

This volatile environment has had immediate effects on global energy markets. With tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude futures have remained above the $85 per barrel mark. All these messages going back and forth and changing direction completely just adds to the confusion and the complexity of the whole situation,
Larsen said.
Political Stakes and Potential Consequences
The decision to expand operations beyond limited naval strikes carries significant political risk for the U.S. administration. Nader Hashemi, a professor of Middle East politics at Georgetown University, told Al Jazeera that the domestic political cost of a sustained occupation would be substantial, with potential blowback among the president’s own political base. Analysts remain skeptical that a long-term occupation of Iranian islands is a viable strategy, noting that such a move would likely hand Tehran a powerful narrative as the victim of an occupying power.
Find more reporting in our World section.
Related reading
- En direct, guerre en Ukraine – Indignation en Ukraine après le départ du ministre de la Défense Mykhaïlo Fedorov
- Hong Kong Police Raid Independent Bookstores and Arrest 5
- Todd Blanche AG Confirmation Hearing: Key Takeaways, Trump Ties, and Senate Tension (world-today-journal.com)
- Trump Overturns Suspension of ICE Traffic Stops Despite Fatal Shootings (archynewsy.com)
Discover more from Archyworldys
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.